Went to the museum of the occu­pa­tion of Latvia today. Very confronting.

Latvia has been occu­pied by both Ger­many and Russia con­tinu­ously from 1939, first one, then the other, then back to the Red Army. In the pro­cess, a third of all Latvi­ans were killed. All of the Jews shot during the brief Nazi occu­pa­tion. Thou­sands sent to work­camps. And then when the worst of the work­camps are past, Rus­si­ans move in, so that now Latvi­ans make up only 58% of the pop­u­la­tion. In Riga, they’re a minor­ity. In 1993, they declared inde­pend­ence and now they’re apply­ing to join the EU.

I’m a mon­grel mix of eth­ni­cit­ies, but apart from the Dutch, the rest is mostly East­ern Europe. Some of you may know the ridicu­lous story of how I thought I was ethnic Rus­sian until I found out as an adult that most of those trap­pings around the house were tour­ist trinkets bought on a trip my par­ents made to Russia when I was 5 or something.

This is partly a trip about roots. I am going to Kiev, where my grand­father was born. After so many years hanging around with re-enact­ors and Celtic enthu­si­asts, I am tra­cing *my* her­it­age, going to museums of his­tory and look­ing at the clothes my people wore in the 10th and 11th cen­tur­ies. And here’s where I stop, struck dumb by my own thoughts. *My* people? What does *that* mean?

The museum of Jewish Cul­ture in Latvia only goes back to the 17th cen­tury. Are the 11th cen­tury clothes of the models in the Museum of the His­tory of Latvia what Jews of the period would have worn? Were there even Jews here then?

What does it *mean* anyway? One of the reas­ons I ended up in dif­fi­culties with Zack’s friend Anneke was an awk­ward dis­cus­sion about the Holo­caust. Zack respon­ded with some­thing about find­ing life easier by not identi­fy­ing as any­thing (he’s from a Jewish her­it­age too). But to me that’s a cop-out, and besides, a guy wear­ing a Sawanee sweat­shirt is very strongly identi­fy­ing as some­thing: an Amer­ican, from a par­tic­u­lar homet­own. He even calls it “rep­res­ent­ing”.

Of course, not “identi­fy­ing”, not “labelling” is exactly what I’ve been rant­ing about for the last 15 years to anyone who’ll listen. I am the pomo, anti-cat­egory, anti-label queen. And yet here I am talk­ing about “my” people.

The occu­pa­tion of Latvia by Ger­mans and Rus­si­ans is espe­cially power­ful for me. The Ger­mans would have killed me because I was Jewish. The Rus­si­ans also oppressed minor­ity Jews – like my Ukrain­ian grand­father – and would have killed me or depor­ted me for being an intel­lec­tual, polit­ical, for refus­ing to com­prom­ise and write poetry in praise of Stalin.

This key ques­tion of dif­fer­ence, of iden­tity and how it is tied up with lan­guage is vital. I pre­sume it is why you are study­ing Scots gaelic, dr_zero although I’ve never dis­cussed it with you.

I’ve never wanted to learn Rus­sian really. But I think maybe learn­ing yid­dish and Ukrain­ian are some­where in my future.

Once again, a post with no con­clu­sions what­so­ever. Over to you lot: what does the phrase “my people” mean to you?