I’m not going to recap the argu­ments right this second (in part because I’m still fin­ish­ing the read­ing and don’t have time; in part because I’ve taught domestic viol­ence as part of pre­vi­ous sub­jects and don’t feel I need to). I may do so later… I’m a little annoyed with myself for not remem­ber­ing to check the fig­ures in the read­ings from last semester.

Instead I just want to think through my tutorial plan. I think I’m going to ask the stu­dents, first up, whether they agree we’ve estab­lished that there is such a thing as a harm­ful cul­tural prac­tice and that such harm­ful cul­tural prac­tices also exist in our cul­ture. Then I’m going to ask them to think about the applic­a­tions this course might have for them and the idea that they might end up in policy devel­op­ment or in inter­na­tional fora deal­ing with such issues. I’m going to argue that domestic viol­ence, honour killings and forced mar­riage all con­situte harm­ful cul­tural prac­tices that involve viol­ence against women. I’m going to ask them to form three groups: one deal­ing with domestic viol­ence policy, one deal­ing with honour killings and honour crimes, and one deal­ing with child mar­riage. I’m going to ask them to for­mu­late a coher­ent policy with prac­tical out­comes to address these issues, along with ini­tial steps for imple­ment­a­tion. I think that might be about 20–25 mins. Then, appoint­ing a spokes­per­son, each group should present their policy to the wider group. Say, 5 mins each, taking it to 15 mins total.