I’m not sure what to make of the riots in Copenhagen. For those who haven’t heard, the Danish police entered a squatted building that had been used as a youth centre for more than 25 years, and evicted the squatters. Why? Because, in 2000, a “Christian organization” (that’s all the news said, I’m not sure who they are) bought the building, and now wants to use it.
So, what happened? The day that the eviction was due to take place, there was a large, peaceful demonstration out the front of the building. The eviction took place anyway. Then, there were violent clashes. There have now been more than 600 arrests. The footage shows a burning city, cops in riot gear and the whole usual, horrible spectre.
I’m saddened: by more violence, rather than the lessons of the non-violence movements of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament; by the lack of government/police response to enormous peaceful demonstrations of what people want (ie: stopping the evictions) that mean that young people feel that violence is their only option; by the idea that a group of Christians thinks that evicting people running a youth centre instead of working *with* them makes sense.
And it makes me pessimistic about creating longterm alternative community when police and governments come down and smash it arbitrarily, not in the service of capital or government, but supposedly in the service of another more “acceptable” form of organization that has “legitimacy” both in its public acceptability and its ownership of the building. I’m sure it’s intended to have this effect, to be disheartening. I’m left with the question of how to engage with governments and police to convince them to legitimize such alternative systems when they are so longterm. Do we want such recognition? Is that the same as de facto relationships having “the same” recognition as State-blessed marriages? I think I do want something that says: if squatters have been running a community service from a squatted space for more than five years (replace with arbitrarily agreed figure) then the space shall be deemed to be under their control until such time as they vacate it voluntarily. Or something.
Guess you just have to keep going in cases like this: think what would have happened to queer rights if everyone just gave up after Stonewall!