I’m really annoyed with this dis­cus­sion of public schools being ‘too polit­ic­ally cor­rect and values neut­ral’. What Howard *really* means is “not Chris­tian”. The example he gave in this morn­ing’s paper of ‘too polit­ic­ally cor­rect’ was that some schools thought put­ting on nativ­ity plays would offend some stu­dents. Too right it would. (For the record, I’m a proud alum­nus of the public school system thanks to par­ents who are polit­ic­ally in favour of State edu­ca­tion. They wer­en’t opposed to reli­gious edu­ca­tion, which in my case occurred on a Sunday in ‘Hebrew school’ at Temple Emmanuel Chatswood).

Yet the responses of the Teach­er’s Union and the public schools union is not to answer with the strength and bene­fits of mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism, but rather to respond vaguely “we are so teach­ing values”. 

I find it even more bizarre that this is occur­ring at the same time as France is strug­gling with ques­tions of whether to ban the hijab, kippot and large Chris­tian crosses in an attempt to main­tain the sep­ar­a­tion between church and state while the US increas­ingly praises ‘faith-based’ ini­ti­at­ives. Is there per­haps a con­nec­tion between being pro-pre-empt­ive strikes and sup­port­ing mind­less adher­ence to elit­ism and reli­gious education?