And then there are the days when you find clear, coherent critiques of what you’re attempting, and you think, yes, these are exactly the doubts I have about my work, exactly the queries that arise, exactly what I mean when I say: is what I’m doing enough, effective, the right thing to do?
I will not abandon the project of enacting justice. Enacting justice in queer Asian America involves a rearticulation of the Utopian possibilities of community building against the disenabling impulses of the dominant social order. Too many scholars have given up on this project, preferring instead to “theorize the subject” by detailing the myriad ways in which we might be thought to exist. Some of those theories are compelling, but some of them seem pointless and detached. Worse, some blur important distinctions between action and negotiation, inclusion and representation, power and powerlessness. Too many activists have given up as well, focusing instead on individual expression and narcissistic explorations of victimization, leaving justice and other lofty ideals to the scholars.
Aguilar-San Juan, Karin. “Going Home: Enacting Justice.” Q&A: Queer in Asian America. eds. David L. Eng & Alice Y. Hom. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1998: 25–40.
Well yes, okay, except that one of my major issues is with “community building” if it means a queer Asian micro-community. But I am keenly interested in collectivity building, in networks and connections between us that can be political and powerful.
I could give you a “what I did on my weekend” type of post, but this is more important. Maybe I’ll do that tomorrow.